Open Hatch

I find track 06 from this old Nintendo game uniquely interesting and cool.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

(download mp3, ~2.39 MB, 2:44)

Also track 26, though maybe it gets older faster (still, it’s really a crime against my hardcore Nintendo music roots to even suggest that any such music could be redundant).

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

(download mp3, ~2.04 MB, 2:44)

I’d pick and choose other cool tracks to post here, but I’d be uploading half the game’s music. Or all of it.

I’m far overdue posting how to rip these tracks to mp3 files for those interested

But this wouldn’t be complete without the games’ title/screen/opening.. anthem?

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

(download mp3, ~1.94 MB, 2:44)

I’ve been wanting something like this for some time and may have finally found it. This tool is great:

tag2find

After installation you can “tag” any file with a right-click, then left click “Quick Tag this..”. To “tag” a file means to associate one or more words or phrases with it. Then this tool lets you search for files you have tagged. If you copy or move the file, this background program automatically updates its database – it keeps track of the file for you. This is very useful if you move files around and otherwise have a hard time keeping track of them, or simply don’t like the dozen mouse clicks otherwise necessary to peruse your folder heirarchy

Better still, when you install it, it asks you where you want its tag database to be located. That way, when you inevitably must reformat the Windows hard drive and assuming you maintain the good (nay, crucial) practice of backing up your files to a separate hard drive, this database will still be available and usable.

Another implication of determining the database location is (blathering now) show

The advantage of using an external database is there is no fuss with the varying, incompatible, dysfunctional standards for tagging files themselves. The tag data is external to the file yet perfectly managed in reference to it. Even when you can tag a file in Windows, this often uses file system informational extensions which can get wiped out if you copy the file to another drive (or other media), or worse, if they are copied elsewhere, it may be when you don’t want them to be.

The program runs in the background, apparently does not produce any noticeable slowdown, has a minimalistic and great user interface, and it can integrate with the Windows shell right-click menu (which is what allows you to right-click a file to tag it).

My initial impressions of this tool are very positive – I think this will probably be a keeper.

Best of all, it’s free.

Google Desktop, I hear you say? Problems:

• Privacy – you may not be aware it can submit its search index of your personal files to a server. Superfluous lawsuit and subpoena? There went all your privacy. (Never mind that we have very little privacy by modern practices – unless extreme self-protection is your avocation.)
• Inefficiency; it is behemoth and sluggish because it indexes everything
• As a consequence of 2, it is mostly useless – when I have used it to search for email or file name text I know exists, it hasn’t found it – because it is still indexing the other 90% of useless information on my hard drive, and it hasn’t indexed what I’m looking for yet.
• No file tagging.
• I boycott Google when I can, for reasons I’ve blathered about here too often. Google it under this domain or search “google” in my blog’s (non-Google!) search tool.

Nope. tag2find wins hands down.

[Update 2010-01-31]

Just spotted this YouTube video about an upcoming “next generation” version of this tool. Watching this video, I’m completely baffled why an investor would drop funding for this. The project is apparently and unfortunately lagging for that reason. But watch this video.

They’re also planning an API that will allow external tools to interact with it, including, it seems implied, link tagging (like delicious.com) and web object tracking (such as individual photographs – and/or tags associated with them? – posted to Picasa)? If so, and from that video also, I think the next generation version will be very hot when it comes out.

‘Twas grace that taught my heart to grieve
And grace my heart to sing
For Him whose Death is my Rebirth;
The Everlasting Spring!

If you search, you’ll find that dozens of different versions of Amazing Grace and additional verses can be found. This verse is mine.

From here.

The green bacterial looking clusters in the final sequence before it evolves into a blur – that is one of the coolest artistic abstractions I’ve ever seen. But I think the whole sequence is breathtaking.

Here’s a shout out to the variants of my domain name I never managed to secure, openhatch.com and .org (I only secured this here .net).

Clearly the term “Gay Mechanics” in the article’s subject is a typographical error; Same Gender Attracted professional mechanics are never mentioned in the article, neither the assortment of alternately male-ended or female ended shafts any mechanic may often find himself, uh, handling, neither indeed the assortment of gruff, bear-like fellows they may find themselves among.

I know at least several gay mechanics, and I’ve learned to stop worrying and start loving them.

But oh, by dag nab, dontcha wish I’d gotten my hands on those domains now?

[If the subject in the linked article reads not "gay" but "game", it is because the poster of the article corrected the error.]

For example – in Mozilla Thunderbird, to add an RSS feed and manage reading it in a sensible, organized way, you must follow detailed steps involving figures A through P (or 1 to 16; PLUS, if you want to know that this is 16 steps (simply to measure the extent of your technical fatigue), you must count A-P on your fingers. Unless you happen to know off-hand that P is the 16th letter of the English Alphabet. I didn’t.)

[The header of the concluding section of that article says: "That Was Painless". Um, if you're used to following, say, 42-step technical processes in your everyday work, maybe, in comparison.]

This should be a three to four step process:

1. Click the RSS icon in the address bar of Firefox.

2. Select “Subscribe Using Thunderbird”, which should be available by default (if you want Thunderbird to even be in the equation – which, even if it is, Firefox doesn’t tell you in the subscription button – it assumes you just know). Since this is not available by default, you have to follow a 5 step configuration to make that available.

3. Thunderbird comes up with a window, asking “If you want to add [title of RSS feed] to your Thunderbird RSS Subscriptions, select the account and folder you’d like to add it to.” – providing drop-down menus to select the account and folder.

Theoretically, it’s possible to get it down to such a three or four step task (and that page only got me heading in the general right direction). I haven’t gotten it to work. And this is in lieu of many more hacking steps I’d really rather avoid.

I thought these two applications were kinda cuddly friends? My exploration of the idea doesn’t find any proof..

That statement is mine, and it’s a conclusion I draw (again), after reading this, from an article entitled “Reckless Myopia”:

We face two possible states of the world. One is a world in which our economic problems are largely solved, profits are on the mend, and things will soon be back to normal, except for a lot of unemployed people whose fate is, let’s face it, of no concern to Wall Street. The other is a world that has enjoyed a brief intermission prior to a terrific second act in which an even larger share of credit losses will be taken, and in which the range of policy choices will be more restricted because we’ve already issued more government liabilities than a banana republic, and will steeply debase our currency if we do it again. It is not at all clear that the recent data have removed any uncertainty as to which world we are in..

Andrew Smithers, one of the few other analysts who foresaw the credit implosion and remains a credible voice now, concurred last week in an interview with my friend Kate Welling.. “The good news so far is that the stock market got down to pretty much fair value or even, possibly, a tickle below it, at its March bottom. But now it has gone up… we probably have a market which is, roughly, 40% overpriced. In order to assess value, it is necessary [to speak financial Vulcan about two different stock market valuation methodologies].. The validity of both of these approaches can be tested and is robust under testing – and they produce results that agree. Currently, both q and CAPE are saying that the U.S. stock market is about 40% overvalued.”..

One of the fascinating aspects of the past few months is the lack of equilibrium thinking with respect to what happened to the trillions of dollars in government money that has been spent to defend the bondholders of mismanaged financial companies. Almost by definition, money given to corporations will show up most quickly as improvements in corporate earnings, and then slightly later, as executive compensation. A few pieces came across my desk last week, hailing the ability of the corporate sector to bounce back from the recent economic downturn even though revenues have continued to suffer and employment has been steeply cut. Why is this a surprise? Where else could the money have gone? Labor compensation? It is truly mind-numbing that a moment after a temporary surge of trillions of dollars, borrowed and tossed out of a helicopter (though to specific corporations and private beneficiaries), analysts would hail a subsequent improvement in corporate results as evidence of “resilience.”

Since early 2008, beginning with the provision of non-recourse funding in the Bear Stearns debacle, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have repeatedly allocated or implicitly obligated public funds to defend the bondholders of mismanaged financial companies. This has included the outright and non-recourse purchase of nearly a trillion dollars in mortgage securities that have no explicit guarantee by the U.S. government. By purchasing these securities outright (rather than through a well-defined repurchase agreement), the Fed is effectively obligating the U.S. government to either guarantee them or to absorb any future losses.

Aside from the fraction of bailout funding that was specifically allocated by Congress through legislation, these actions represent an unconstitutional breach into enumerated spending powers that are the domain of the elected members of Congress alone. The issue here is not whether the Fed should be independent from political influence. The issue is the constitutionality of the Fed’s actions. The discretion that it has exerted over the past two years crosses the line into prerogatives reserved for Congress. That line needs to be clarified sooner rather than later.

Emphatically, the trillions of dollars spent over the past year were not in the interest of protecting bank depositors or the general public. They went to protect bank bondholders. Instead of taking appropriate losses on those bonds (which financed reckless mortgage lending), those bonds are happily priced near their face value, for the benefit of private individuals, thanks to an equivalent issuance of U.S. Treasury debt. But that’s not enough. Outside of a very narrow set of institutions that are subject to compensation limits, just watch how much of the public’s money – which benefitted several major investment banks following a very direct route – gets allocated to Wall Street bonuses in the next few weeks.

I find this simply scary.

The past few days, the Philadelphia Bank Index (which allegedly “leads” the markets) has been dramatically declining in comparison to the S&P 500 stock index, which has been making defiant yet pathetic attempts at remaining bullish. At the same time, volume is declining sharply – big money is selling out of large positions (and buying up hedges, and loading up on option puts, which profit from declines). Banks decline, prices expand, volume contracts – the whole picture is undecided – or maybe decidedly tearing apart in several directions. Something has to give – and today the S&P finally started to drop fairly quickly at closing.

I have speculations in the market turning down (even sharply). And I still think it will. Watch the TZA ticker, which goes the opposite of the S&P, times 3 (meaning UP three times as much, I’m hoping). I’m banking on it taking an upswing or spiking, to above 13.35, by Dec 19th.

Improbable Research, a university organization devoted to highlighting the absurd in real-life scientific research and development, is today radio broadcasting their annual Ig Nobel prize ceremony, which awards this farcical prize for the most improbable scientific work of the year.

This short YouTube video from a series the organization assembles is a fine example of some of their hilarious findings.

This is their page about the broadcast today, linking to the NPR listing of local carrier schedules of the broadcast and Science Friday’s web broadcast page.

For my area I’m tuning into KUER-FM 90.1 from noon to 2 for the broadcast.

I’ve been overhearing one of the audiobook recordings of A Series of Unfortunate Events, as my wife listens through it with our children, and she paused it and talked to them about it:

They’re laughing at the circus freaks because they think they’re better than them. But is that right? .. No, it isn’t, is it?

And this just got me thinking: We’re all freaks.

Which leads to:

All we like freaks have run away; we have run every one and joined our Circus; …

I’ve been playing through an old favorite of mine, the game EARTHBOUND, with my very young son, reading everything to him (and he likes the game very much). As I’ve been playing I’ve grabbed screen shots of what reminds me why I love the game. This is a gallery of those screen grabs.

What I love about the game:

• It is the story of four children who conquer Giygas, the Cosmic Destroyer.
• Japanese wackiness. As you can see from the gallery, it is full of good-natured, daffy characters.
• It is incredibly musically versatile, prolific, expressive, and in my opinion, beautiful. Here is the track for your home.

  Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

• The ultimate, world-saving weapon in the game is prayer. This is combined with the work of knocking back into their senses anyone or anything that has gone wild or insane (such as a Rowdy Mouse or Insane Cultist). Or, if they are a mortal enemy (such as a lil’ UFO, Spinning Robo, or Starman), destroying them.

I’m posting this awesome tune from a commodore 64 game I never played. But I’m listening to it. This is by the renowned 64 composer Rob Hubbard.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

(Download MP3, ~4.5MB)

I was at Buy Low in Provo this evening, looking at toilet paper. I saw what seemed like a good bargain to me, and as I started to grab a package, an old woman driving an automated cart arrived, and held up a package from her cart.

This one’s got a thicker weave, but it’s softer, it’s easier on your buns. You get six in a package for four dollars, and it’ll last you longer.

Ya gotta shop when the right folks are around to help you out.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (34.0MB)

See my description and the YouTube upload here.

Only a few months ago, researchers at Yale unveiled the first Electronic Quantum Processor.

It operates on two qubits, which exist in multiple states simultaneously (that’s the quantum mechanical aspect). When they add more qubits, they’ll be able to calculate multiples of multiple states in one processor cycle.

Excerpt:

Because of the counterintuitive laws of quantum mechanics, however, scientists can effectively place qubits in a “superposition” of multiple states at the same time, allowing for greater information storage and processing power.

For example, imagine having four phone numbers, including one for a friend, but not knowing which number belonged to that friend. You would typically have to try two to three numbers before you dialed the right one. A quantum processor, on the other hand, can find the right number in only one try.

“Instead of having to place a phone call to one number, then another number, you use quantum mechanics to speed up the process,” Schoelkopf said. “It’s like being able to place one phone call that simultaneously tests all four numbers, but only goes through to the right one.”

What is the potential? Here’s a way to spell it out mathematically, going off Wikipedia’s article on the topic:

A classical computer has a memory made up of bits, where each bit represents either a one or a zero. A quantum computer maintains a sequence of qubits. A single qubit can represent a one, a zero, or, crucially, any quantum superposition of these; moreover, a pair of qubits can be in any quantum superposition of 4 states, and three qubits in any superposition of 8. In general a quantum computer with n qubits can be in an arbitrary superposition of up to 2n different states simultaneously (this compares to a normal computer that can only be in one of these 2n states at any one time).

Where that describes a pair of qubits (two) in a superposition of 4 states, this means the qubits are in 4 different states at the same time. Following this, a trio of qubits (three) are in a superposition of 8, so that it follows the order of exponents or powers, which proceed like this:

• 2 qubits = 2 to the second power (2^2) = superposition of 4 simultaneous states
• 3 qubits = 2 to the third power (2^3) = superposition of 8
• 4 qubits = 2 to the fourth power (2^4) = superposition of 16
• 5 qubits = 2 to the fifth power (2^5) = superposition of 32..

With each additional qubit, the simultaneous states (or superpositions) doubles, so that:

• 8 qubits = 2 to the eighth power (2^8) = superposition of 256..
• 16 qubits = 2 to the sixteenth power (2^16) = superposition of 65,536..
• 32 qubits = 2 to the thirty-second (2^32) = superposition of 4,294,967,296..
• 64 qubits = 2 to the sixty-fourth (2^642) = superposition of 18,446,744,073,709,551,616..

What is that last extremely large number leading with an 18? That’s eighteen quintillion – going from thousands, to millions, to billions, to trillions, to quadrillions, to quintillions. More precisely, almost 18-and-a-half quintillion.

What does this all mean? Current computers operate in Gigahertz, meaning a billion calculations in one second; a computer processor with a speed of 3 Gigahertz runs around 3 billion calculations in one second.

(This is staggering, just by itself.)

When they create a sixty-four qubit quantum computer, it will be capable of running a calculation requiring around 18 and a half quintillion guesses in a few clock cycles (only a few millionths of a second).

Carl Sagan, eat your heart out.

Don’t get too excited yet. They haven’t figured out how to even build a computer around this yet. It’s only a processor.

But it’s a quantum processor. A two-bit quantum-processor, with quantum logic gates and a quantum bus.

With this kind of power, you’ll be able to find the 39-digit number which, when you run it through an image processing algorithm, will by algorithmic decompression happen to exactly match a digital image which without compression takes 1 gigabyte to store, but once you find the one out of 5 duodecillion 39-digit “fingerprint” numbers that match the image, you’ll be able to losslessly “compress” the image to only several hundred bytes. I don’t necessarily know what I’m really talking about here, but it will be something like that.

You live in a Star Trek universe.

One day, possibly in your future, this will look something like this article.

Last night we (my wife and I) watched Season 4 Episode 9, entitled THE HUB, on DVD. This episode in particular was tremendous – but the whole series is.

There has not been one single episode in four seasons that has disappointed me.

My wife came “on board” late – she was updated of goings-on by watching the (funny) “What the frak is going on?” trailer – which you can watch at that link.* She thought the whole show would be trite, based on this trailer – no, the trailer is designed to be funny, but the show has real moral complexity and depth. If you lack time, I’d just watch that trailer and jump in to season 4 – but the show is very much worth watching from season 1.

My only criticism is minor – which is that they overuse the show-invented curse “frak” (hey, guess what that means??!)- where, agreements that loosely comparable military culture may be rich with curses aside -I think invented curses and lingo rarely (if ever) work well in fiction.

Hmm.. two technical complaints. Many of the actors are with The Mumbles – you need closed captions to understand them sometimes. And a dying Cylon prayed, and cried out “Heavenly Father..” (!!) and the closed captions did not transcribe it!

*I regret to advise FireFox users that I have never gotten the video player at that link to work in FireFox – only in Internet Explorer.